Sharpen every teacher's judgement, at class scale.
One teacher, thirty students, mixed ability. The gap is real, and it isn't anyone's fault. Orimentis is the second chance after class: a Socratic tutor that picks up exactly where the lesson left off, at each student's pace, grounded in the same specification you're working to. Then it shows you where the class's understanding is forming, so your finite, expert attention lands where it matters most, never as a window into private conversations.
It strengthens the work. It never does it for them.
The real question to ask of any AI in a classroom isn't how much it can do. It's whether it automates the production or strengthens theprocess, because the struggle to produce the thing is where the learning lives. So Orimentis is built to keep the student doing the thinking. It won't hand over the essay, the answer or the worked solution; it asks the question that gets them unstuck and stops short, so the effort, and the understanding it produces, stays theirs. The homework a student brings back still reflects what they actually know. And it's the same discipline that serves them long after the exam: a tutor that keeps the learner doing the thinking protects their agency and the habit of learning itself, not just the grade in front of them.
Aligned to your teaching
Grounded in AQA, Edexcel and OCR specifications (the same command words, scope and depth you teach to), so it reinforces your scheme of work, never cuts across it.
A partner to the teacher
More than a supplement, and never a replacement. The tutor takes on more of the work so you end up more in control, not less: it aims your finite, expert attention where it matters most, multiplying your judgement instead of grading for you or auditing your students.
The student stays the centre
The learner is the user and the centre. Where a teacher's wish and a student's privacy or understanding ever pull apart, the learner wins. We serve you in service of them, never the other way round.
The reteach radar
The most useful thing a tutor can hand a teacher isn't a transcript. It's a map of where understanding is forming and where misconceptions are taking hold. That's what we're building toward: a calm, class-level picture of which spec points are solid, which are wobbly, and which misconceptions are live in the room, so you know what to revisit before it hardens into an exam-day error. "Twelve of your class hold the osmosis-is-active-transport misconception" is instructional gold, and it contains nothing private. It lives entirely at the level of understanding, never the conversation that produced it.
What a teacher sees, and what we'll never build
Thoughtful teachers are right to distrust tools that watch students. So we draw a hard line, and we publish it: teachers see the shape of understanding, never its contents. A misconception is a property of understanding; a conversation is a private utterance. We surface the first and never the second, and the student is told, in plain terms, exactly what you can and cannot see. What we'll surface is what we're building toward; what we'll never build is a commitment already in force.
What we'll surface
- Class-level understanding shapeWhich spec points the class is solid on, which are wobbly, what's improving: your reteach radar.
- Misconception patternsWhich misconceptions are live in the class and how common they are: precisely what to reteach, at the level of understanding alone.
- Spec coverage, kept honestCalm evidence of use for coordinators: never gamified, never a leaderboard.
What we'll never build
- No conversation accessTeachers never read a student's dialogue with the tutor. Not verbatim, not summarised, not "for review." The contents are the student's.
- No surveillance consoleNo time-on-task, no questions-asked, no last-seen. Understanding to teach to, never behaviour to police.
- No grading by proxyThe tutor informs your assessment; it never automates it, replaces it, or feeds a markbook.
- No data weaponised against a studentMisconception flags exist to help you reteach: never to rank, shame, set, or discipline.
What a pilot looks like
We're partnering with a small number of schools and trusts for the 2026-27 year. A good pilot earns a sceptical teacher's trust in a fortnight: they try it on their hardest topic, and the first thing they see is what their class doesn't yet understand, not a surveillance feed. Through the term it becomes a reteach radar; by exam season, a way to target the few students still holding a specific misconception. And because the misconceptions that trip up one cohort tend to trip up the next, the picture compounds across years, sharpening not just this class, but your teaching of every class that follows. Per-student licensing is kept deliberately affordable, and we're building to a safeguarding standard fit for under-18s: minimal data, no advertising, privacy by design. Register below and we'll share the details as places open up.
Build the tutor with the people who teach.
Before any pilot, we're inviting classroom teachers to shape Orimentis with us, so it sharpens your judgement and never surveils your students. No school sign-off needed; just your expertise.
Join the teacher panelRegister your school's interest
Tell us a little about your school. There's no commitment. We'll reach out when pilot places open.
Form not loading? Register directly here.